Skip to main content

Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-5.4 nano

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
vs
OpenAI
GPT-5.4 nano

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3 Opus

Per Request:$0.0525
Daily:$5.25
Monthly:$157.50
Yearly:$1,916.25

GPT-5.4 nano

Per Request:$0.000825
Daily:$0.0825
Monthly:$2.475
Yearly:$30.1125

Cost Differences

$0.051675
Per Request
$5.1675
Daily
$155.025
Monthly
$1,886.1375
Yearly

GPT-5.4 nano costs less than Claude 3 Opus

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.4 nano
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$0.20/1M tokens
Output Price$75.00/1M tokens$1.25/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output4,096 tokens8,192 tokens
Categoryflagshipefficient
Capabilities
textvisionreasoning
text
Release Date3/4/20243/6/2026

Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-5.4 nano: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3 Opus and GPT-5.4 nano depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-5.4 nano is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens99% cheaper than Claude 3 Opus. Meanwhile, Claude 3 Opus offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-5.4 nano.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude 3 Opus is a flagship model while GPT-5.4 nano is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude 3 Opus is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while GPT-5.4 nano offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3 Opus charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $1.25 for GPT-5.4 nano. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-5.4 nano has the edge here at $1.25/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude 3 Opus supports vision (image inputs) while GPT-5.4 nano is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3 Opus when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, reasoning)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose GPT-5.4 nano when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 8,192 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3 Opus (Anthropic)

GPT-5.4 nano (OpenAI)

Start using Claude 3 Opus today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-5.4 nano today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3 Opus or GPT-5.4 nano?
GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude 3 Opus — that's 99% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3 Opus and GPT-5.4 nano?
Claude 3 Opus supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-5.4 nano supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of Claude 3 Opus.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-5.4 nano is the lower-cost option, while Claude 3 Opus offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose GPT-5.4 nano for budget sensitivity or Claude 3 Opus for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3 Opus costs about $157.50/month and GPT-5.4 nano costs about $2.475/month. Overall, GPT-5.4 nano has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $1.25 out) vs Claude 3 Opus.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles