Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-4o
Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-4o: GPT-4o is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($2.50/M vs $15.00/M input tokens), while Claude 3 Opus is better for long-context tasks (200,000 tokens).
Direct answer: choose GPT-4o for lower token spend and choose Claude 3 Opus when your workload needs longer context.
Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Claude 3 Opus
GPT-4o
Cost Differences
GPT-4o costs less than Claude 3 Opus
Quick Recommendation
Winner for direct API pricing: GPT-4o. At the default workload, GPT-4o saves about $135.00/month ($1,642.50/year) versus Claude 3 Opus.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Claude 3 Opus | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Input Price | $15.00/1M tokens | $2.50/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $75.00/1M tokens | $10.00/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 4,096 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Category | flagship | flagship |
| Capabilities | textvisionreasoning | textvisionaudio |
| Release Date | 3/4/2024 | 5/13/2024 |
Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-4o: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4o depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-4o is the more affordable option at $2.50/1M input tokens — 83% cheaper than Claude 3 Opus. Meanwhile, Claude 3 Opus offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-4o.
These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: GPT-4o would save you roughly $13,500.00/month compared to Claude 3 Opus. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.
Output costs matter too. Claude 3 Opus charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $10.00 for GPT-4o. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-4o has the edge here at $10.00/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.
Best Use Cases
Choose Claude 3 Opus when:
- • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
- • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
Choose GPT-4o when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need longer outputs (up to 16,384 tokens)
- • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
Pros and Caveats at a Glance
Claude 3 Opus
- • Input pricing: $15.00/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $75.00/M tokens
- • Context window: 200,000 tokens
- • Max output: 4,096 tokens
Watch out for
- • Higher input cost than GPT-4o
- • Higher output cost than GPT-4o
GPT-4o
- • Input pricing: $2.50/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $10.00/M tokens
- • Context window: 128,000 tokens
- • Max output: 16,384 tokens
Watch out for
- • Smaller context window than Claude 3 Opus
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Claude 3 Opus (Anthropic)
GPT-4o (OpenAI)
Start using Claude 3 Opus today
Sign Up for Anthropic →Start using GPT-4o today
Sign Up for OpenAI →Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Claude 3 Opus or GPT-4o?▼
What is the context window difference between Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4o?▼
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?▼
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼
Where can I compare Anthropic and OpenAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?▼
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.