Skip to main content

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-5.3 Codex

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
vs
OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Per Request:$0.0105
Daily:$1.05
Monthly:$31.50
Yearly:$383.25

GPT-5.3 Codex

Per Request:$0.008750
Daily:$0.875
Monthly:$26.25
Yearly:$319.375

Cost Differences

$0.001750
Per Request
$0.175
Daily
$5.25
Monthly
$63.875
Yearly

GPT-5.3 Codex costs less than Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 SonnetGPT-5.3 Codex
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$3.00/1M tokens$1.75/1M tokens
Output Price$15.00/1M tokens$14.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens32,768 tokens
Categorybalancedcoding
Capabilities
textvisioncode
textcode
Release Date10/22/20243/1/2026

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-5.3 Codex: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-5.3 Codex depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-5.3 Codex is the more affordable option at $1.75/1M input tokens42% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Meanwhile, GPT-5.3 Codex offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a balanced model while GPT-5.3 Codex is coding. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5.3 Codex targets more demanding workloads, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3.5 Sonnet charges $15.00/1M output tokens vs $14.00 for GPT-5.3 Codex. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-5.3 Codex has the edge here at $14.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports vision (image inputs) while GPT-5.3 Codex is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet when:

  • • You need more capabilities (vision)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose GPT-5.3 Codex when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Anthropic)

GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI)

Start using Claude 3.5 Sonnet today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-5.3 Codex today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-5.3 Codex?
GPT-5.3 Codex is cheaper for input tokens at $1.75 per million tokens vs $3.00 for Claude 3.5 Sonnet — that's 42% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-5.3 Codex?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-5.3 Codex supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 56,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.3 Codex.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-5.3 Codex is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.3 Codex offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose GPT-5.3 Codex for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.3 Codex for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs about $31.50/month and GPT-5.3 Codex costs about $26.25/month. Overall, GPT-5.3 Codex has lower combined input + output rates ($1.75 in, $14.00 out) vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles