Skip to main content

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-5.1

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-5.1: GPT-5.1 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($1.25/M vs $3.00/M input tokens), while GPT-5.1 is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose GPT-5.1 for lower token spend and choose GPT-5.1 when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
vs
OpenAI
GPT-5.1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Per Request:$0.0105
Daily:$1.05
Monthly:$31.50
Yearly:$383.25

GPT-5.1

Per Request:$0.006250
Daily:$0.625
Monthly:$18.75
Yearly:$228.125

Cost Differences

$0.004250
Per Request
$0.425
Daily
$12.75
Monthly
$155.125
Yearly

GPT-5.1 costs less than Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: GPT-5.1. At the default workload, GPT-5.1 saves about $12.75/month ($155.125/year) versus Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 SonnetGPT-5.1
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$3.00/1M tokens$1.25/1M tokens
Output Price$15.00/1M tokens$10.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens131,072 tokens
Categorybalancedflagship
Capabilities
textvisioncode
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
Release Date10/22/202411/12/2025

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-5.1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-5.1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-5.1 is the more affordable option at $1.25/1M input tokens58% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Meanwhile, GPT-5.1 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a balanced model while GPT-5.1 is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5.1 targets more demanding workloads, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3.5 Sonnet charges $15.00/1M output tokens vs $10.00 for GPT-5.1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-5.1 has the edge here at $10.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet when:

  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose GPT-5.1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (audio, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

  • Input pricing: $3.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $15.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 200,000 tokens
  • Max output: 8,192 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than GPT-5.1
  • Higher output cost than GPT-5.1
  • Smaller context window than GPT-5.1

GPT-5.1

  • Input pricing: $1.25/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $10.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 131,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Anthropic)

GPT-5.1 (OpenAI)

Start using Claude 3.5 Sonnet today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-5.1 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-5.1?
GPT-5.1 is cheaper for input tokens at $1.25 per million tokens vs $3.00 for Claude 3.5 Sonnet — that's 58% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-5.1?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-5.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 800,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.1.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-5.1 is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.1 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose GPT-5.1 for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs about $31.50/month and GPT-5.1 costs about $18.75/month. Overall, GPT-5.1 has lower combined input + output rates ($1.25 in, $10.00 out) vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
Where can I compare Anthropic and OpenAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Anthropic vs OpenAI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.