Skip to main content

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs o4-mini

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs o4-mini: Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.80/M vs $1.10/M input tokens), while o4-mini is better for long-context tasks (2,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Claude 3.5 Haiku for lower token spend and choose o4-mini when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
vs
OpenAI
o4-mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Per Request:$0.002800
Daily:$0.28
Monthly:$8.40
Yearly:$102.20

o4-mini

Per Request:$0.003300
Daily:$0.33
Monthly:$9.90
Yearly:$120.45

Cost Differences

+$0.000500
Per Request
+$0.05
Daily
+$1.50
Monthly
+$18.25
Yearly

o4-mini costs more than Claude 3.5 Haiku

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Claude 3.5 Haiku. At the default workload, Claude 3.5 Haiku saves about $1.50/month ($18.25/year) versus o4-mini.

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 Haikuo4-mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$0.80/1M tokens$1.10/1M tokens
Output Price$4.00/1M tokens$4.40/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens2,000,000 tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryefficientreasoning
Capabilities
textvision
textreasoningcode
Release Date11/4/20244/16/2025

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs o4-mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3.5 Haiku and o4-mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Claude 3.5 Haiku is the more affordable option at $0.80/1M input tokens27% cheaper than o4-mini. Meanwhile, o4-mini offers a significantly larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Claude 3.5 Haiku.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude 3.5 Haiku is a efficient model while o4-mini is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. o4-mini targets more demanding workloads, while Claude 3.5 Haiku provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3.5 Haiku charges $4.00/1M output tokens vs $4.40 for o4-mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude 3.5 Haiku has the edge here at $4.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude 3.5 Haiku supports vision (image inputs) while o4-mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose o4-mini when:

  • • You need a larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning, code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • Input pricing: $0.80/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 200,000 tokens
  • Max output: 8,192 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than o4-mini

o4-mini

  • Input pricing: $1.10/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.40/M tokens
  • Context window: 2,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 131,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Claude 3.5 Haiku
  • Higher output cost than Claude 3.5 Haiku

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic)

o4-mini (OpenAI)

Start using Claude 3.5 Haiku today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using o4-mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or o4-mini?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper for input tokens at $0.80 per million tokens vs $1.10 for o4-mini — that's 27% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3.5 Haiku and o4-mini?
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200,000 tokens while o4-mini supports 2,000,000 tokens — a difference of 1,800,000 tokens in favor of o4-mini.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the lower-cost option, while o4-mini offers a larger context window (2,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku for budget sensitivity or o4-mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3.5 Haiku costs about $8.40/month and o4-mini costs about $9.90/month. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku has lower combined input + output rates ($0.80 in, $4.00 out) vs o4-mini.
Where can I compare Anthropic and OpenAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Anthropic vs OpenAI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.