Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Compare Anthropic and Mistral AI AI models
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Mistral Medium 3.1
Cost Differences
Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less than Claude 3.5 Haiku
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.80/1M tokens | $0.40/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $4.00/1M tokens | $2.00/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max Output | 8,192 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Category | efficient | balanced |
| Capabilities | textvision | textcodereasoning |
| Release Date | 11/4/2024 | 8/1/2025 |
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Mistral Medium 3.1: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Mistral Medium 3.1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Medium 3.1 is the more affordable option at $0.40/1M input tokens — 50% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Meanwhile, Claude 3.5 Haiku offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
These models come from different providers — Anthropic and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
These models target different tiers: Claude 3.5 Haiku is a efficient model while Mistral Medium 3.1 is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Mistral Medium 3.1 targets more demanding workloads, while Claude 3.5 Haiku provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. Claude 3.5 Haiku charges $4.00/1M output tokens vs $2.00 for Mistral Medium 3.1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Medium 3.1 has the edge here at $2.00/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Claude 3.5 Haiku supports vision (image inputs) while Mistral Medium 3.1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.
Best Use Cases
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when:
- • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
- • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need more capabilities (code, reasoning)
- • You need longer outputs (up to 16,384 tokens)
- • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic)
Mistral Medium 3.1 (Mistral AI)
Start using Claude 3.5 Haiku today
Sign Up for Anthropic →Start using Mistral Medium 3.1 today
Sign Up for Mistral AI →