Skip to main content

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-5.4 nano

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-5.4 nano: GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.20/M vs $0.80/M input tokens), while Claude 3.5 Haiku is better for long-context tasks (200,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose GPT-5.4 nano for lower token spend and choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
vs
OpenAI
GPT-5.4 nano

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Per Request:$0.002800
Daily:$0.28
Monthly:$8.40
Yearly:$102.20

GPT-5.4 nano

Per Request:$0.000825
Daily:$0.0825
Monthly:$2.475
Yearly:$30.1125

Cost Differences

$0.001975
Per Request
$0.1975
Daily
$5.925
Monthly
$72.0875
Yearly

GPT-5.4 nano costs less than Claude 3.5 Haiku

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: GPT-5.4 nano. At the default workload, GPT-5.4 nano saves about $5.925/month ($72.0875/year) versus Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.4 nano
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$0.80/1M tokens$0.20/1M tokens
Output Price$4.00/1M tokens$1.25/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens8,192 tokens
Categoryefficientefficient
Capabilities
textvision
text
Release Date11/4/20243/6/2026

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-5.4 nano: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-5.4 nano depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-5.4 nano is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens75% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Meanwhile, Claude 3.5 Haiku offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-5.4 nano.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: GPT-5.4 nano would save you roughly $592.50/month compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3.5 Haiku charges $4.00/1M output tokens vs $1.25 for GPT-5.4 nano. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-5.4 nano has the edge here at $1.25/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude 3.5 Haiku supports vision (image inputs) while GPT-5.4 nano is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose GPT-5.4 nano when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • Input pricing: $0.80/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 200,000 tokens
  • Max output: 8,192 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than GPT-5.4 nano
  • Higher output cost than GPT-5.4 nano

GPT-5.4 nano

  • Input pricing: $0.20/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $1.25/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 8,192 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Claude 3.5 Haiku

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic)

GPT-5.4 nano (OpenAI)

Start using Claude 3.5 Haiku today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-5.4 nano today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or GPT-5.4 nano?
GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $0.80 for Claude 3.5 Haiku — that's 75% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-5.4 nano?
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-5.4 nano supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of Claude 3.5 Haiku.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-5.4 nano is the lower-cost option, while Claude 3.5 Haiku offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose GPT-5.4 nano for budget sensitivity or Claude 3.5 Haiku for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3.5 Haiku costs about $8.40/month and GPT-5.4 nano costs about $2.475/month. Overall, GPT-5.4 nano has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $1.25 out) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku.
Where can I compare Anthropic and OpenAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Anthropic vs OpenAI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.