Skip to main content

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-5.4 mini

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
vs
OpenAI
GPT-5.4 mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Per Request:$0.002800
Daily:$0.28
Monthly:$8.40
Yearly:$102.20

GPT-5.4 mini

Per Request:$0.003000
Daily:$0.30
Monthly:$9.00
Yearly:$109.50

Cost Differences

+$0.000200
Per Request
+$0.02
Daily
+$0.60
Monthly
+$7.30
Yearly

GPT-5.4 mini costs more than Claude 3.5 Haiku

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.4 mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$0.80/1M tokens$0.75/1M tokens
Output Price$4.00/1M tokens$4.50/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryefficientefficient
Capabilities
textvision
textvisioncode
Release Date11/4/20243/6/2026

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-5.4 mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-5.4 mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Claude 3.5 Haiku is the more affordable option at $0.80/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, GPT-5.4 mini offers a significantly larger context window at 1,050,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Claude 3.5 Haiku.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Claude 3.5 Haiku would save you roughly $60.00/month compared to GPT-5.4 mini. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3.5 Haiku charges $4.00/1M output tokens vs $4.50 for GPT-5.4 mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude 3.5 Haiku has the edge here at $4.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when:

  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose GPT-5.4 mini when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,050,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic)

GPT-5.4 mini (OpenAI)

Start using Claude 3.5 Haiku today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-5.4 mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or GPT-5.4 mini?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper for input tokens at $0.80 per million tokens vs $0.75 for GPT-5.4 mini.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-5.4 mini?
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-5.4 mini supports 1,050,000 tokens — a difference of 850,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.4 mini.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.4 mini offers a larger context window (1,050,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.4 mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3.5 Haiku costs about $8.40/month and GPT-5.4 mini costs about $9.00/month. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku has lower combined input + output rates ($0.80 in, $4.00 out) vs GPT-5.4 mini.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles