Skip to main content

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4 Turbo

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
vs
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Per Request:$0.002800
Daily:$0.28
Monthly:$8.40
Yearly:$102.20

GPT-4 Turbo

Per Request:$0.025
Daily:$2.50
Monthly:$75.00
Yearly:$912.50

Cost Differences

+$0.0222
Per Request
+$2.22
Daily
+$66.60
Monthly
+$810.30
Yearly

GPT-4 Turbo costs more than Claude 3.5 Haiku

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-4 Turbo
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$0.80/1M tokens$10.00/1M tokens
Output Price$4.00/1M tokens$30.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens4,096 tokens
Categoryefficientflagship
Capabilities
textvision
textvisioncode
Release Date11/4/20244/9/2024

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4 Turbo: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-4 Turbo depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Claude 3.5 Haiku is the more affordable option at $0.80/1M input tokens92% cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo. Meanwhile, Claude 3.5 Haiku offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-4 Turbo.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude 3.5 Haiku is a efficient model while GPT-4 Turbo is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-4 Turbo targets more demanding workloads, while Claude 3.5 Haiku provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3.5 Haiku charges $4.00/1M output tokens vs $30.00 for GPT-4 Turbo. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude 3.5 Haiku has the edge here at $4.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 8,192 tokens)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose GPT-4 Turbo when:

  • • You need more capabilities (code)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic)

GPT-4 Turbo (OpenAI)

Start using Claude 3.5 Haiku today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-4 Turbo today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or GPT-4 Turbo?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper for input tokens at $0.80 per million tokens vs $10.00 for GPT-4 Turbo — that's 92% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-4 Turbo?
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-4 Turbo supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of Claude 3.5 Haiku.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the lower-cost option, while Claude 3.5 Haiku offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku for budget sensitivity or Claude 3.5 Haiku for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3.5 Haiku costs about $8.40/month and GPT-4 Turbo costs about $75.00/month. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku has lower combined input + output rates ($0.80 in, $4.00 out) vs GPT-4 Turbo.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles