Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4.1 nano
Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4.1 nano
Cost Differences
GPT-4.1 nano costs less than Claude 3.5 Haiku
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Input Price | $0.80/1M tokens | $0.10/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $4.00/1M tokens | $0.40/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 8,192 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Category | efficient | efficient |
| Capabilities | textvision | text |
| Release Date | 11/4/2024 | 4/14/2025 |
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4.1 nano: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-4.1 nano depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-4.1 nano is the more affordable option at $0.10/1M input tokens — 88% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Meanwhile, Claude 3.5 Haiku offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-4.1 nano.
These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: GPT-4.1 nano would save you roughly $750.00/month compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.
Output costs matter too. Claude 3.5 Haiku charges $4.00/1M output tokens vs $0.40 for GPT-4.1 nano. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-4.1 nano has the edge here at $0.40/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Claude 3.5 Haiku supports vision (image inputs) while GPT-4.1 nano is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.
Best Use Cases
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when:
- • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
- • You need more capabilities (vision)
- • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Choose GPT-4.1 nano when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic)
GPT-4.1 nano (OpenAI)
Start using Claude 3.5 Haiku today
Sign Up for Anthropic →Start using GPT-4.1 nano today
Sign Up for OpenAI →