Skip to main content

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4.1 mini

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4.1 mini: GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.40/M vs $0.80/M input tokens), while Claude 3.5 Haiku is better for long-context tasks (200,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose GPT-4.1 mini for lower token spend and choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
vs
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Per Request:$0.002800
Daily:$0.28
Monthly:$8.40
Yearly:$102.20

GPT-4.1 mini

Per Request:$0.001200
Daily:$0.12
Monthly:$3.60
Yearly:$43.80

Cost Differences

$0.001600
Per Request
$0.16
Daily
$4.80
Monthly
$58.40
Yearly

GPT-4.1 mini costs less than Claude 3.5 Haiku

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: GPT-4.1 mini. At the default workload, GPT-4.1 mini saves about $4.80/month ($58.40/year) versus Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-4.1 mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$0.80/1M tokens$0.40/1M tokens
Output Price$4.00/1M tokens$1.60/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens16,384 tokens
Categoryefficientefficient
Capabilities
textvision
textvisioncode
Release Date11/4/20244/14/2025

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4.1 mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-4.1 mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-4.1 mini is the more affordable option at $0.40/1M input tokens50% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: GPT-4.1 mini would save you roughly $480.00/month compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3.5 Haiku charges $4.00/1M output tokens vs $1.60 for GPT-4.1 mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-4.1 mini has the edge here at $1.60/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when:

  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose GPT-4.1 mini when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need more capabilities (code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 16,384 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • Input pricing: $0.80/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 200,000 tokens
  • Max output: 8,192 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than GPT-4.1 mini
  • Higher output cost than GPT-4.1 mini

GPT-4.1 mini

  • Input pricing: $0.40/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $1.60/M tokens
  • Context window: 200,000 tokens
  • Max output: 16,384 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic)

GPT-4.1 mini (OpenAI)

Start using Claude 3.5 Haiku today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-4.1 mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or GPT-4.1 mini?
GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper for input tokens at $0.40 per million tokens vs $0.80 for Claude 3.5 Haiku — that's 50% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-4.1 mini?
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-4.1 mini supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Claude 3.5 Haiku.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-4.1 mini is the lower-cost option, while Claude 3.5 Haiku offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose GPT-4.1 mini for budget sensitivity or Claude 3.5 Haiku for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3.5 Haiku costs about $8.40/month and GPT-4.1 mini costs about $3.60/month. Overall, GPT-4.1 mini has lower combined input + output rates ($0.40 in, $1.60 out) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku.
Where can I compare Anthropic and OpenAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Anthropic vs OpenAI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.