Skip to main content

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4.1

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
vs
OpenAI
GPT-4.1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Per Request:$0.002800
Daily:$0.28
Monthly:$8.40
Yearly:$102.20

GPT-4.1

Per Request:$0.006000
Daily:$0.60
Monthly:$18.00
Yearly:$219.00

Cost Differences

+$0.003200
Per Request
+$0.32
Daily
+$9.60
Monthly
+$116.80
Yearly

GPT-4.1 costs more than Claude 3.5 Haiku

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-4.1
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$0.80/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Output Price$4.00/1M tokens$8.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryefficientflagship
Capabilities
textvision
textvisioncode
Release Date11/4/20244/14/2025

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4.1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-4.1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Claude 3.5 Haiku is the more affordable option at $0.80/1M input tokens60% cheaper than GPT-4.1.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude 3.5 Haiku is a efficient model while GPT-4.1 is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-4.1 targets more demanding workloads, while Claude 3.5 Haiku provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3.5 Haiku charges $4.00/1M output tokens vs $8.00 for GPT-4.1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude 3.5 Haiku has the edge here at $4.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose GPT-4.1 when:

  • • You need more capabilities (code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic)

GPT-4.1 (OpenAI)

Start using Claude 3.5 Haiku today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-4.1 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or GPT-4.1?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper for input tokens at $0.80 per million tokens vs $2.00 for GPT-4.1 — that's 60% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-4.1?
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-4.1 supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Claude 3.5 Haiku.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the lower-cost option, while Claude 3.5 Haiku offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku for budget sensitivity or Claude 3.5 Haiku for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3.5 Haiku costs about $8.40/month and GPT-4.1 costs about $18.00/month. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku has lower combined input + output rates ($0.80 in, $4.00 out) vs GPT-4.1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles