Skip to main content

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Codex Mini

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
vs
OpenAI
Codex Mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Per Request:$0.002800
Daily:$0.28
Monthly:$8.40
Yearly:$102.20

Codex Mini

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

Cost Differences

+$0.001700
Per Request
+$0.17
Daily
+$5.10
Monthly
+$62.05
Yearly

Codex Mini costs more than Claude 3.5 Haiku

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 HaikuCodex Mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$0.80/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Output Price$4.00/1M tokens$6.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryefficientefficient
Capabilities
textvision
textcodereasoning
Release Date11/4/20242/2/2026

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Codex Mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Codex Mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Claude 3.5 Haiku is the more affordable option at $0.80/1M input tokens47% cheaper than Codex Mini.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Claude 3.5 Haiku would save you roughly $510.00/month compared to Codex Mini. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3.5 Haiku charges $4.00/1M output tokens vs $6.00 for Codex Mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude 3.5 Haiku has the edge here at $4.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude 3.5 Haiku supports vision (image inputs) while Codex Mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Codex Mini when:

  • • You need more capabilities (code, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic)

Codex Mini (OpenAI)

Start using Claude 3.5 Haiku today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using Codex Mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Codex Mini?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper for input tokens at $0.80 per million tokens vs $1.50 for Codex Mini — that's 47% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Codex Mini?
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200,000 tokens while Codex Mini supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Claude 3.5 Haiku.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the lower-cost option, while Claude 3.5 Haiku offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku for budget sensitivity or Claude 3.5 Haiku for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3.5 Haiku costs about $8.40/month and Codex Mini costs about $13.50/month. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku has lower combined input + output rates ($0.80 in, $4.00 out) vs Codex Mini.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles